Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Exploring the Dynamics of High CEO Compensation: Insights from Starbucks

The AFL‑CIO Executive Paywatch report based on 2024 SEC filings reveals that Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol earned a staggering $98 million. This makes him the highest-paid CEO among the top 500 U.S. public companies, reflecting a compensation gap 6,666 times more than the company’s typical worker, earning less than $15,000 annually.

While Niccol's pay stands as an anomaly, it underscores a broader trend: the average S&P 500 CEO compensation was $18.9 million in 2024, 285 times more than the median worker's $49,500 salary, up from a 268:1 ratio in 2023. Among the top earners are Bob Iger at Disney and executives at Axon, Netflix, Apple, and JPMorgan, each with substantial compensation packages reaching into the eight- or nine-figure range.

Explaining High CEO Compensation

1. Performance-Based Pay Structures

Executive compensation is often structured around measurable outcomes such as stock price performance, total shareholder return, and EPS growth. CEOs like Niccol receive significant long-term equity awards to align their interests with shareholder value. Nevertheless, critics argue these packages sometimes reward outcomes not aligned with median worker contributions.

Image 1

2. Market Pressure for Skilled Talent

Corporations maintain that attracting elite leadership in competitive industries demands premium pay. Boards offer substantial rewards to retain executives capable of managing global consumer and tech firms, influenced in part by peer benchmarking within elite compensation groups.

3. Governance Interactions and CEO Influence

Compensation committees may not act autonomously from management. According to studies cited by News.com, compensation consultants foster higher CEO pay by aiming for upper percentile benchmarks. Additionally, CEOs can influence board decisions, weakening internal checks and fostering a high-compensation culture.

Image 2

The stark pay ratio in Niccol’s case partly arises from Starbucks’ workforce composition: predominantly part-time employees, many of whom are students or hold barista roles as side jobs. Furthermore, Starbucks provides a diverse range of benefits to part-time staff.

Corporate Impact and Executive Leadership

Despite public criticism of large compensation packages, companies argue such pay reflects the substantial responsibilities of their leaders, impacting shareholder returns, brand strength, and employee success. For instance, Brian Niccol’s CEO tenure at Starbucks followed his transformative leadership at Chipotle, where he revitalized the brand post-crisis, earning trust and profitability—a critical qualification for Starbucks as it expands globally and updates its operations.

Image 3

Proponents of performance-based compensation argue that strong leadership can cause beneficial ripple effects: improving corporate performance, enhancing job security, boosting stock prices, and investing in employee training and infrastructure. Niccol’s “Back to Starbucks” strategy includes $500 million in labor and store investment, plans to enhance 1,000 stores by 2026, and service and menu innovations.

Notably, many large firms with significant CEO-to-worker pay disparities continue investing in workforce development and community impact. At Apple, CEO Tim Cook—earning 1,447 times the average employee—has expanded workforce education and sustainability initiatives, and JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon champions workforce reentry programs and small business loans in underserved areas. Similarly, Walmart, often critiqued for its CEO pay gap, has raised average hourly wages above $17 and introduced tuition-free college programs for employees. These efforts underscore how executive leadership can support broader worker-centric initiatives, particularly when firms are transparent about human capital and community investment strategies.

Ultimately, the real measure—financial performance, employee benefit, and sustainable growth—will be demonstrated over time. In compensation debates, it's essential to consider pay as just one aspect of corporate governance and value creation.

For taxpayers, understanding how executive pay influences corporate strategy and its effects on jobs, benefits, and economic policy is critical. Contact our office for expertise in tax planning tailored to your needs.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .