Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Michigan's New Marijuana Tax: Key Legal Battle

The US state of Michigan is currently embroiled in a significant legal dispute over a newly introduced 24% wholesale marijuana tax, igniting discussions on cannabis taxation frameworks nationwide. The impending court decision is crucial, as it might affect not only cannabis pricing but also establish precedents for altering voter-ratified laws.

Regardless of whether you reside in Michigan or a distant state, the outcome of this case is pivotal. The ruling could shape how states draft and modify cannabis taxes, signaling potential judicial hurdles as the cannabis sector evolves.

Here’s a detailed insight into the situation.

What Does Michigan’s Tax Proposal Entail?

In its 2025–2026 budget, Michigan legislators approved a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, intended to fund infrastructure enhancements. This levy applies before dispensary sales, elevating the tax structure in the state to one of the most multi-layered in the U.S.

Currently, Michigan imposes two additional taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on cannabis retail sales, authorized by the 2018 voters.

  • A 6% state sales tax. Introduction of the proposed wholesale tax would elevate Michigan’s cannabis tax rates considerably.

Why Did Industry Stakeholders Initiate Legal Action?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) argues the tax is unconstitutional. Their contention revolves around a critical issue:

The voter-backed 2018 cannabis law cannot be altered without a supermajority vote.

The legislation legalized recreational cannabis under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), shielding it from amendments without a three-fourths supermajority in the legislature. However, the tax bill was approved with a mere simple majority.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol underscored the importance in her comments to Michigan Advance:Image 3

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry groups also caution that the tax could drive up costs, burden small enterprises, and propel consumers towards untaxed sources — an issue prevalent in high-tax states like California.

Schedule a Free Consultation
Let's build a strong financial plan
Click Here

Counterarguments by the State

Michigan’s legal defense posits the tax's legality based on:

  • The introduction of a new tax, not an amendment to the existing 2018 cannabis act.

  • The legislature’s mandate to levy taxes as necessary for budgetary requirements.

  • Its objective is to bolster road infrastructure, not to modify cannabis legislation.

Should judicial authorities uphold this view, the tax may commence by January 1, 2026.

Consumer Implications

The case’s outcome holds significance beyond Michigan. If the levy withstands the legal test:Image 2

  • Wholesale cannabis costs will escalate.

  • Retail prices could rise in response.

  • Customers might resort to less expensive, unregulated markets.

  • Smaller cannabis entities may confront consolidation pressures.

Conversely, their defeat would leave Michigan's reasonably affordable tax framework unaltered.

Significance Beyond Michigan

Despite originating in Michigan, the lawsuit’s ramifications extend nationwide.

1. It examines voter law limitations

If lawmakers bypass supermajority rules for tax additions, it could transform ballot initiative processes across participating states.

2. It could affect cannabis taxation in other states

Facing infrastructural financial shortfalls, states might contemplate similar taxes if the Michigan law sustains.

3. It underscores the disparity in cannabis tax rates

States like Oregon and Michigan levy moderate taxes, keeping legal cannabis viable, unlike higher-taxed regions like California.

This Michigan case could set the stage for similar tax policy litigations elsewhere.

Future Developments

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has reviewed initial arguments. A decision is anticipated soon and may proceed to the Michigan Supreme Court.Image 1

The final judgment will be impactful — not solely for Michigan's cannabis market, but in setting precedents for state governance on voter-endorsed initiatives within burgeoning sectors and fiscal legislation.

Schedule a Free Consultation
Let's build a strong financial plan
Click Here
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .